43.0° Complete Forecast |
|
![]() |
![]()
|
UPDATE: Chimp attack prompts national outcry
Posted on 02/18/2009
By CHASE WRIGHT Times Staff Writer and HAROLD COBIN Times Correspondent STAMFORD -- A Stamford police officer shot and killed a pet chimpanzee Monday after the animal brutally attacked a friend of its owner. Police were called to the owner's home at 241 Rock Rimmon Road at 3:44 p.m. on a report that the 200-pound chimpanzee, named Travis, was attacking 55-year-old Charla Nash of Stamford. As of Wednesday, Nash was still in critical condition at Stamford Hospital, having sustained life-threatening injuries to her face and hands and a tremendous loss of blood, said Stamford Police Capt. Richard Conklin. Nash had been asked by Travis' owner, 70-year-old Sandra Herold, to come to her home to help coax Travis back into the house after he escaped by using a key to unlock the front door. Travis then turned on Nash, bolting after her and brutally beating her in the driveway of Herold's home. Stamford police arrived shortly after the attack and were forced to kill Travis when he cornered one officer inside his police cruiser. Police played back the horrific dispatch communication for more than a dozen members of the media who gathered at Stamford Police headquarters Tuesday evening. The audio included a wildly distraught Herold, who took refuge inside her car and pleaded for police to respond to the scene as her pet ape punched and bit the face of Nash as she lay motionless in the driveway. "Please, you have to shoot this chimp!" Herold screamed to the dispatch unit on the other line. "He's killing my friend -- he ripped her apart!" Communication from officers on the scene was equally gruesome. After reaching Nash in the driveway, one officer responded to dispatch, "We got to get this guy out of here, he's got no face!" The attack on Nash was so brutal, officers couldn't decipher the gender of the victim. The attack lasted about 12 minutes and police officers responded within five minutes of Herold's 911 call, said Conklin. Units armed with Tazers also reported to the scene, said Conklin, but weren't utilized due to the close proximity required of the weapon. Conklin said police are continuing to investigate the incident and have not ruled out filing charges. He said police are still investigating what could have caused the chimp to suddenly go berserk, but said the department is basing its investigation on three theories -- the anti-anxiety drug Xanax given to Travis by the owner prior to the attack, reactions to any medication given to the primate for his alleged Lyme Disease and Nash's new haircut, which Travis saw for the first time Monday and could have made the Stamford resident appear to be a stranger to the chimpanzee. The chimp's body has been split and transported to two separate locations, said Conklin. As mandated under state law, Travis' head is being tested for rabies at a lab in Connecticut. It will then be reunited with his body, which has been taken to the University of Connecticut for the autopsy, where toxicology tests will likely determine what medications Travis was taking, said Conklin. Local animal advocates say the reason behind the attack is one based on nature over nurture. The president of the international animal advocacy group Friends of Animals, Pricilla Feral, said when chimps reach their teen years they become increasingly rambunctious and unpredictable with their behavior. "Keeping an animal like that as a pet and force-training it goes against all of its natural instincts," she said. "For an attack like this to happen should be expected." Beardsley Zoo Director Gregg Dancho added that while chimps appear cute and cuddly in their early years, their natural aggressive attitudes make them unsuitable to be kept as pets. He said raising a chimp like a child, as Herold did with Travis, could make them confused in their later years, adding to their aggression. Monday's attack has drawn national attention, as state and local officials consider passing new legislation and amending existing statues over exotic pet ownership laws. Connecticut allows primates as pets with a state permit. The rule, passed into law in 2004, grandfathered animals who were already in the state on Oct. 1, 2003, but only for smaller species that weigh up to 50 pounds at maturity. Talking with the state Department of Environmental Protection, Conklin said he learned the DEP overlooked this legislation and allowed the Herold's to keep Travis even though he weighed more than three-times the legal limit. According to the statute, the issuance of such permits is left up to the discretion of the commissioner. Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said a state statute was passed last year in regard to the possession of potentially dangerous animals and penalties for noncompliance with the law. Primates are not on that list, but a separate statute allows any Connecticut municipality to impose its own regulations to prohibit the keeping of wild or domestic animals. "As a matter of state law, Stamford would have the authority to take action," said Blumenthal. Blumenthal added that his office will be requesting the legislature review the new statute and update the list of dangerous animals to include primates. He is also looking for the legislature to amend the 2004 statute, making it more specific. "The (2004) statute gives the DEP discretion to issue regulations, but in this case it didn't do so," said Blumenthal. "That lack of regulation allowed these Stamford homeowners to keep this animal as a pet." The attack in Stamford has even caught the attention of legislators on the other side of the country. U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., and the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) announced Tuesday they are renewing calls for the passage of the Captive Primate Safety Act, which would prohibit interstate commerce in primates for the pet trade, making it illegal for individuals to buy or transport a pet primate across state lines. "Given the patchwork of state and local laws, and the interstate nature of the primate pet trade, a federal response is urgently needed," said Michael Markarian, executive vice president of the HSUS. "Primates are wild animals who can attack and spread disease, and they don't belong in our bedrooms and basements."
COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in The Stamford Times community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines. Basically, be civil, smart, on-topic and free from profanity. Don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read! And remember: We may miss some, so we need your help to police these comments. Please identify the comment, the story and why you think it's objectionable.
Read the commenting guidelines |
I agree that in light of the case, things should be done to try to prevent this sort of occurrence. The problem is attacks can and do happen, regardless of anything we do to try and prevent "accidents". Please try to remember that people are hurting over the loss of a family pet who was loved and the potential loss of a human friend. These are hard enough without trying to place too much blame and hatred on the situation.
Peace and prayers to all concerned.
Posted by: TMP | Feb 19, 2009
reply
My heart is truly broken for the victim, for the horrendous trauma she has endured, for the owner, as her heart is certainly broken losing a precious member of her family (whether acceptable or not in the eyes of society), as well as the chimp, whom had no choice in his upbringing and surroundings and was an innocent victim himself.
We should be careful not to pass judgement, but offer our prayers in such a time of need.
May God be with the many victims suffering from this ordeal.
Posted by: sb | Feb 19, 2009
reply
I am floored that Stamford allowed her to keep this animal even though it was 4x the legal weight limit, and after he escaped in 2003 downtown they STILL let her keep it!
I strongly advocate very strict legislation to restrict exotic animals as residential pets!!
Posted by: anonymous | Feb 18, 2009
reply
Posted by: anonymous | Feb 19, 2009
reply
Posted by: Chimps are wild animals | Feb 21, 2009
reply
A. Leave wild animals in the wild. They have no need to be our "pets", "friends", etc.
B. Neuter/Spay domestic companion animals (dogs, cats, rabbits). Overpopulation of these creatures results in many of them being euthanized (killed), even when they are young and healthy.
Posted by: Leave Them in Peace | Feb 19, 2009
reply
If it hadn''t have been this ladies friend it could have been a child outside playing.
It''s time to end any and all . No concessions.
I understand the owners love their pets. And they will grieve. But what loss is greater?
Time to round them all up and put them in zoo''s.
And that is sad for the animal also..
No winners here..But at least stop the huge loosers like this poor woman now mutilated for life.
It should never happen again.
Posted by: Mary | Feb 18, 2009
reply
As for animals who cannot go back to their original habitat because they were unjustly taken from their parents and forced to live in a house, these beings should be cared for by experts familiar with their needs and capacities -- in sanctuaries.
No state ought have allowed Travis to be kept in a home. Primates should absolutely not be kept as pets.
How sad and outrageous, the way Travis, and the parents of Travis were used. A law is one thing, but we''ve seen interstate laws pass before regarding "captive wild animals" and they have been narrow and contained loopholes. In 2003, George W. Bush signed the Captive Wildlife Safety Act into law. It was touted by some of the wealthy animal-protection groups at the time, but it was much too narrow to prevent what happened to Travis and to Charla Nash.
We do need a change deeper than what legal prohibitions can reach. People''s whole worldview needs to change. We need to feel mortified that we could ever have done such a thing. We need to wake up to what''s right and wrong. What''s right for a chimpanzee is to grow up with other chimpanzees, be nurtured and nursed for five years by a mother. What''s wrong is to think we can substitute for their nature and their social interactions, and to take them out of their own territory. There should be no chimpanzees, no primates at all in Connecticut other than the human kind. And animals who can live free in this world ought to have our full backing to do so.
Lee Hall
Legal director for Friends of Animals - Connecticut
Board, Primarily Primates - Texas
Posted by: Lee Hall, Friends of Animals & Primarily Primates | Feb 18, 2009
reply
Posted by: anonymous | Feb 18, 2009
reply
Posted by: Amy Kerwin | Feb 18, 2009
reply
decent care is a fine idea, yet our economy is harrowing
and private sanctuaries now need the help that well-heeled
national animal advocacy groups can extend.
Priscilla Feral
President, Friends of Animals
www.friendsofanimals.org
President, Primarily Primates
www.primarilyprimates.org
Posted by: Priscilla Feral | Feb 19, 2009
reply
Posted by: anon | Feb 18, 2009
reply
*Lost BOTH EYES
*Lost part of her JAW
*Multiple and severe soft tissue facial injuries (nose, lips, etc)
*Lost BOTH HANDS
While dog attacks can be deadly and disfiguring, I have yet to hear of a dog attack of THIS magnitude. Frankly? I would rather pet a strange pitbull than any chimpanzee. Pitbulls are domesticated, chiimps ar enot.
Posted by: horrified | Feb 19, 2009
reply
The reason male chimpanzees are more dangerous is because their psychology resembles another dangerous primate - male human beings.
Posted by: Durlin | Feb 19, 2009
reply
Posted by: Priscilla Feral | Feb 19, 2009
reply
Posted by: LAZ | Feb 19, 2009
reply
Posted by: AC | Feb 19, 2009
reply
Posted by: Keep Wild animals wild | Feb 25, 2009
reply
Posted by: AC | Feb 19, 2009
reply
Animals considered "domestic" pets attack more often than "wild" pets. It just isn''t always newsworthy. Don''t get me wrong, I think this subject needs to be approached in a more responsible manner. There is no black and white in this matter. I have had the great joy of having exotic animals for pets. But that was when I lived far enough away from the general population that they were not a threat to anyone but me. The problem is that even though people should have the right to have whatever pet they want, they should not have the right to endanger others'' lives and safety by doing so. When I decided to have children I, it was after I no longer had my exotic pets. In my case it was big cats that I had adopted because they had severe health issues as youngsters and I worked for a veterinarian so I provided the care they needed for their rather short lives. But there was no way they I would have them around children even though they were very loving animals their entire lives.
Anyway, what I''m trying to say is that no animal is safe (wild or domesticated) in all circumstances. But if people would stop arguing about their own personal belief of what''s right or wrong, there could be a solution to this. Maybe set aside a place for people who want to live with such animals to do so as long as they are not endangering others. Work out the details and try a comprimise. The animals are already out there and can not be turned back to the wild so humans need to get things worked out. For the sake of every species involved.
Posted by: Jody | Feb 19, 2009
reply
For the number of dogs and cats that are kept as pets.. the percentage of domestic chimp attacks is pretty HIGH.. imagine everyone that you know that has a dog or a cat had a chimp instead.. These are completly dangerous wild animals and they attack humans viciously.. how in the WORLD is one allowed to just have one roaming loose
You all who think this is some fluke.. remember MOE and the other chimp in 2005?.. look that story up.. see a familiar outcome? Those chimps weren''t on xannax.. This has nothing to do with xannax.. this was, sadly, inevitable if someone can have a wild beast running free in their house..
Posted by: anonymous | Feb 19, 2009
reply
In short: chimps = really bad idea and not reliably domesticated
dogs and cats = domesticated for numerous decades, centuries and unless you attempt to bring in a panther, mountain lion, wolf, etc., everyone is going to be behind your attempt to build (as per hundreds of years of human civilization) an understanding of a relationship between video/music/digital media and a ''mainstream''
Posted by: anonymous | Feb 21, 2009
reply
Posted by: Jody | Feb 19, 2009
reply
If primates are removed from Connecticut''s households, they''ll find a place in one of the primate sanctuaries that works to get these animals off public display, out of our hands and into proper care and surroundings with members of their own species.
Priscilla Feral
President, Friends of Animals
President, Primarily Primates
www.primarilyprimates.org
www.friendsofanimals.org
Posted by: Priscilla Feral | Feb 21, 2009
reply