weathericon

The Stamford Times


marketplacetwitter
Sports blog: Stamford Sports Scene

UPDATE: Chimp attack victim transferred to Cleveland Clinic




By CHASE WRIGHT

Times Staff Writer


STAMFORD -- The Stamford woman whose face was mauled and bitten by a rampaging chimpanzee has been transferred to the Cleveland Clinic, which two months ago performed the nation's first facial transplant.

Charla Nash, 55, was transferred from Stamford Hospital to the Cleveland Clinic on Thursday, three days after an attack by her friend's chimp left her with extensive injuries to her face and hands.

Bill Ackley, an emergency medical worker who was among the first to tend to Nash, said medical workers found her face down Monday in friend Sandra Herold's driveway, completely unrecognizable. The first police officers on the scene couldn't tell if the body was male or female, and warned dispatchers that the victim's face was ripped away.

Spokeswoman Eileen Sheil said Nash was being seen by a head and neck surgeon and likely will be treated through a team approach involving many specialists.

"I don't know at this point" if a transplant will be considered, Sheil said. "Priority one is to stabilize her."

Four teams of surgeons specializing in hand, plastic, orthopedics, ophthalmology, trauma and anesthesia performed more than seven hours worth of surgery on Nash Monday to stabilize her. She left Connecticut in critical condition, although with her vital signs slightly improved since the operation, hospital officials said.

Nash's transfer to Cleveland likely is because of the clinic's expertise in facial reconstruction -- not because doctors are considering a transplant right away, a leading surgeon said.

"This is a difficult time for the patient and she will need to adjust to it first. All the other options should be discussed first" before something as radical and risky as a transplant is considered, said Dr. Bohdan Pomahac, a reconstructive surgeon at Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.

In December, surgeons at the Cleveland Clinic completed the nation's first facial transplant, of an unidentified woman who suffered a traumatic injury several years ago. The injury left her with no nose, palate, or way to eat or breathe normally.

It was the fourth partial face transplant in the world, though the others were not as extensive. Nor were any done as emergency operations, said Dr. W. P. Andrew Lee, chief of plastic surgery at the University of Pittsburgh.

"It would be unusual" to perform one so soon for Nash, he said. To consider it, doctors must make sure she is medically stable, that alternatives have been carefully considered, and that she truly had given informed consent, because a transplant requires taking anti-rejection drugs lifelong, Lee said.

That could conceivably be done in a matter of weeks, but "to find a suitable donor with matching skin color and size and other features, that's a practical limitation," he said.

Nash was attacked Monday by his owner's 14-year-old pet chimp named Travis, who was shot and killed by police. The owner has said her chimp's behavior was completely out of character, speculating that Travis was being protective of her when he attacked Nash, who was driving a different car and wearing a different hairstyle when the chimp attack.

On Thursday, a second victim came forward saying the same chimp who mauled Nash this week bit her over a decade ago.

Leslie Mostel-Paul, formerly of Stamford, said in an interview broadcast that Travis the chimp bit her hand and tried to pull her into a vehicle in 1996 when she reached in to greet him.

Animal experts say because of his young age, Travis' 1996 attack may have been nothing more than playful aggression.

Chimpanzees usually start biting by two-years-old, which is about how old Travis would have been in 96', said Pricilla Feral, president of the international animal advocacy group Friends of Animals. "At that age they may not mean to harm you, but their aggression is not something you can manage," she said.

Gregg Dancho, zoo director at the Beardsley Zoo in Bridegport said even in their early years chimps should be considered dangerous animals.

"I don't think we could say that (Travis) was predisposed to be a bad animal," said Dancho. "That's chimps. They're still a loaded gun that can go off anytime."

Police are investigating what could have led Travis to suddenly go berserk and attack a face he was so familiar with. They haven't ruled out the possibility of filing charges, and have said they're interested to see the results of the necropsy, which should be released in the next few weeks.

The owner has said she fed Travis Xanax moments before his rampage in an effort to calm him down.

Beardsley Zoo veterinarian Dr. Howard Hochman said while highly unlikely, a dose of Xanax could have made Travis more aggressive prior to the attack. He said Nash's altered appearance was likely the prime contributor.

"Primates have a naturally aggressive and protective way about them," said Hochman. "As they mature it gets riskier and riskier."



The Associated Press contributed to this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in The Stamford Times community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines. Basically, be civil, smart, on-topic and free from profanity. Don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read! And remember: We may miss some, so we need your help to police these comments. Please identify the comment, the story and why you think it's objectionable.
Read the commenting guidelines

Add a new comment

Everyone knows it was Bush''s fault.

Posted by: we be change | Feb 21, 2009
reply


Yep, that monkey was probably a Dem.and if she mentioned a "bush" he could not help but attack.

Posted by: jp | Feb 21, 2009
reply


Just a correction:
"Nash was attacked Monday by his owner''s 14-year-old pet chimp named Travis, who was shot and killed by police."

Thae above sentence implies that Nash is a man, and that his owner has a chimp. I think it should read "...Monday by HER FRIEND''S 14-year-old..."

Thanks for your time. I like your Comment Guidelines.

Posted by: Justin | Feb 20, 2009
reply


I was thinking the same thing:)

Posted by: ♥ | Feb 21, 2009
reply


"his owner" is referring to TRAVIS, not Nash. Nash isn''t owned by anyone. I can see where it could be a misunderstood statement, but take a minute to read it and you''d figure it out.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 23, 2009
reply


It reads incorrectly. I second that and my English is excellent. The person who says it should read Nash was attacked by HER FRIEND''S chimp - is correct. When you say ...his - the HIS refers back to Nash (or the person who was previously mentioned in this case). His does not refer to what may or may not be said later in the sentence. Americans do have their problems with grammar. My husband has the same problems. He never wants to admit it either. He learned things I never did. I''m clueless with millimeters and centimeters, but English is where I excel. Read it again - she was attacked by her friend''s chimp. Quite simple really.

Posted by: babyboomer1001 | Feb 24, 2009
reply


In reading this tragic story, I wonder what the public''s reaction would be if every time the word "chimpanzee" appears in these accounts, it was replaced with "Pit Bull"?

It''s not the chimps fault, it''s the owner, blah blah, blah...

He was so friendly, it was a freak thing...

Where have I heard these excuses before?

Posted by: Kerrie in Seattle | Feb 20, 2009
reply


Well, one reason it is not likely to happen with an American Pit Bull Terrier is that they do not weigh two hundred pounds and are not built pretty much like a human being, only far stronger pound for pound. That pretty well rules them out. Also I have never heard of an APBT doing this kind of damage to a person. Nor of any dog, whereas in the wild, chimps wage war on others including other primates, and DO iflict this kind of bodily harm upon them. But would you have liked it BETTER if the wounds had been inflicted by an American Pit Bull Terrier? I ask only because you seem to imply that, tho it is hard to read tones of voice in print.

Posted by: hermine stover | Feb 20, 2009
reply


Pit bulls incapable of destruction of a similar magnitude? Are you kidding? Cases dealing with the jaws of pit bulls cracking arm bones, leg bones and caving in skulls abound. You should note that the damage from the chimpanzee didn''t'' come from it''s more human physical characteristics - it came from its jaws and its teeth. Pit bulls are unsafe in the wrong hands. I don''t want them banned, just regulated.

Posted by: doglover | Feb 21, 2009
reply


...well, obviously you''ve never spent time in a trauma center.

Pit bulls do rip skin off - including faces, arms, especially in kids.

Posted by: thegooddoctor | Feb 21, 2009
reply


Not only have I spent time in emergency trauma rooms, I have designed them when I was a hospital architect. Much of what comes in is horrifying to see, we just do not want to see the flesh ripped, crushed, burned, destroyed on people by any means. I would have to say the worst things I have seen have been from auto accidents and the occasional burn victim. consider the stats. it is hard to argue when 45 thou people in the USA are killed by cars, and a far larger number are merely damaged, maimed or something in between, as a result between a car and a human body. Myself i have a scar from a dog bite, other than from a pit bulldog, which was so ghastly I felt I had to have a tattoo put over it. I guess some people will stop at nothing to exult over the possible genocide of a breed of dog, but, they will have to justify this to me first. I owe this to my dogs.

Posted by: hermine stover | May 10, 2010
reply


This just goes to show that animals that should be out in the wild make deadly pets. This chimp was just as deadly as the tigers, that people think they can make pets. It''s so sad that Travis had the life he did. He belonged in the wild and shouldn''t have been treated as a human. Who feeds a chimp the food and wine that a human would consume? And Xanax!!

Poor Travis was just a victim of a moronic owner. Don''t get me wrong, though, I feel so bad for the victim of the attack. It was totally preventable.

Posted by: Libby H. | Feb 20, 2009
reply


I wholeheartedly agree. There are two tragedies in this story--the woman who was attacked, but the first and most egregious, the one where the woman had the chimp to begin with--where do you get chimps anyway? What was she thinking? Wild animals are just that.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 22, 2009
reply


The story of Travis the Chimp became even more tragic today after an ACORN spokesperson revealed that Travis was a registered Democrat.

Posted by: miker5 | Feb 20, 2009
reply


In further news, Travis was being considered for Commerce Secretary...

Posted by: Counselor007 | Feb 21, 2009
reply


And in further news yet, it was reported that Travis failed to file and pay back taxes for 12 years. Obama spokespersons downplayed the issue as being a vast right wing conspiracy to discredit Travis, and something that all Americans realize was a harmless mistake. Travis'' mate (owner) blamed it on white male christians who do not support their right to marry.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 21, 2009
reply


are you implying that we have a chimp in the White House???

Posted by: curious onlooker | Feb 20, 2009
reply


I think miker5 was making a crack based on the reputation that ACORN registers people who are normally considered ineligible for voter registration. I don''t think there is any logical construction based on what miker5 said that would result in the implication proposed by curious onlooker.

Posted by: regularmike | Feb 20, 2009
reply


So now you are saying we have a Chimp on crack who''s a Democrat? How dare you?! Travis wanted to register as a Republican, but his "owner" forced him to register like ACORN demanded and he went NUTS. Of course maybe the stimulus package made him hyper too!

Posted by: Libtard | Feb 20, 2009
reply


Are you implying that we don''t??

Posted by: Dgleon | Feb 20, 2009
reply


Yes and a attorney general!

Posted by: Strongwill | Feb 21, 2009
reply


HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now that''s FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 21, 2009
reply


I think the key is the DENIAL that many pet owners are in when it comes to their wild animal pet which has been behaving well for years. They cease to think of it as dangerous. There are WILD animals and there are PETS. Read the list people. Certain animals have been bred for domestication and certain ones have not. Does that spell it clear enough? Pit Bulls are called that because they have a certain tendency to be vicious for "pit fighting" (dogs fighting in a pit) and, like an animal in the wild, this tendency can be dormant for years until just one thing sets it off. Its hard to be sympathetic to the owners. You only have to be sympathetic to the unwitting people around them that the "pet" owner has put in mortal danger. Something in the makeup of these owners compels them to own a dangerous animal, perhaps ego, sense of insecurity, who knows, of all the animals they could own in a responsible way.

Posted by: Animal lover | Feb 20, 2009
reply


well its a sad day that the woman got hurt so badly but u have to remember u can take the chimp out of the wild but u cant take the wild out of the chimp and any time u take a wild thing from it,s habatat and put in places where it dont belong things happen and not allways for good look at what happend to zigfred and roy the tiger they razed from a cub attacked him so i think its best to leave the things where they belong in the wild not at home i hope the woman come,s out of this ok... the best we can do now for her is pray thats she get well and can go on with life

Posted by: Maltduck | Feb 21, 2009
reply


well its a sad day that the woman got hurt so badly but u have to remember u can take the chimp out of the wild but u cant take the wild out of the chimp and any time u take a wild thing from it,s habatat and put in places where it dont belong things happen and not allways for good look at what happend to zigfred and roy the tiger they razed from a cub attacked him so i think its best to leave the things where they belong in the wild not at home i hope the woman come,s out of this ok... the best we can do now for her is pray thats she get well and can go on with life

Posted by: Maltduck | Feb 21, 2009
reply


well its a sad day that the woman got hurt so badly but u have to remember u can take the chimp out of the wild but u cant take the wild out of the chimp and any time u take a wild thing from it,s habatat and put in places where it dont belong things happen and not allways for good look at what happend to zigfred and roy the tiger they razed from a cub attacked him so i think its best to leave the things where they belong in the wild not at home i hope the woman come,s out of this ok... the best we can do now for her is pray thats she get well and can go on with life

Posted by: Maltduck | Feb 21, 2009
reply


An animal is the property of it''s owner. The woman who owned this chimp altered its state of being and totally confused the animal. The animal became dangerous and harmed a human being. As property, the owner is responsible for it and its actions and many court rulings have held this to be so. Therefore, the animal had to be put down when it became an endangerment to society. The owner should be held fully accountable for its actions and legally liable for all damages. There are probably a troop of baboon-like attorneys waiting in the woodworks and banana trees to swoop down on this opportunity!

Posted by: Swami Bubba | Feb 21, 2009
reply


I agree 1000000% here.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 23, 2009
reply


Justin - I had trouble with that sentence, too, but read it again. "... his owner ..." means the chimp''s owner, Ms. Nash. The chimp is a male, hence, "his."

Posted by: JoWriter | Feb 21, 2009
reply


Nash was not the owner. She was the victim.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 21, 2009
reply


"NASH(woman whom was attacked) was attacked Monday by HIS OWNERS(impying that NASH is a HE and is OWNED)14 year-old pet Chimp named Travis"
" Nash was attacked Monday by the 14 year old pet chimp named Travis" is how I think it should be written,but then again what do I know

Posted by: ♥ | Feb 21, 2009
reply


When I read your comment, I laughed so hard. You are right, of course. Nash - She - was attacked by HER (she is a her, too) --- HER FRIEND''S - Herald''s - chimp. Quite simple really. Now, my chance to say that if I didn''t have a laugh somewhere in one of these comments, I just might have shed a tear. My heart goes out to her.

Posted by: babyboomer1001 | Feb 24, 2009
reply


Even though the chimp is a male, ''his'' is not applicable for an animal; it would be ''its''. Another poster was correct- it should have been ''her friend''s'' not ''her owner''s'' ...


"Bush Lied - Chimps Died!"



Posted by: Where Can I Get Me a, Chimpanzee-Huntin' License? | Feb 21, 2009
reply


Prior the 1960''s, animal trainers routinely carried pistols for just such an emergency. "Animal Rights" advocacy removed this option in favor of slow acting, impractical narcotic darts. Anyone keeping a dangerous animal must be prepared to put them down if they go berserk, but few do. The (much too late) responding Police Officer solved the problem with the only means logically possible: High velocity bullets. More proof that being a gun owner saves lives (or in this case, severe irreparable mayhem). Political correctness again proves deadly to it''s victims, because of a foolish "do-gooder" animal owner...

Posted by: Officer Hank | Feb 21, 2009
reply


People of Stamford and The United States... PLEASE WAKE UP! why does it always take something so drastic and horrieble to happen to understand which things we should allow and forbid.
I try as hard as i can in my rational head to understand what makes a person around the globe wake up and say.. hey, everyone has dogs and cats.. I WILL GROW UP A MONEKY!!
I mean please! could u be anymore innocent, what do u think will happen!? there are the odds that he won''t damage anyone during his lifetime, but why even risk the slightest chance for the day he does snap. what''s next oh i had a big giant pool and swam with A GREAT WHITE SHARK for 14 years! yea the kids loved him.. but one day he snapped and ate one of them!
All i can say is it''s sorry for that poor friend who just came over for a visit and now her life will never be the same.
It is the responsibility of the goverement or who ever is incharge to infroce laws to prevent this from happening!
so simple to the common logic, yet so hard to understand how this things still happen!
hope this lines don''t fall on deaf ears.. AMERICA deserves better stories than TRAGIC ones!

Posted by: ben | Feb 21, 2009
reply


News Flash! -- Chimpanzees, just like lions, bears, tigers, etc., are actually wild animals!

It''s silly to assume that one can truly "tame" a wild animal. This really should not be considered news. A tiger is a tiger, a bear is a bear, a chimpanzee is a chimpanzee. If you choose to pretend otherwise you''ll eventually pay the price. Or perhaps one of your friends/family members will pay the price.

The owner of the animal in question should be charged with criminal negligence.








Posted by: DJ | Feb 21, 2009
reply


Great Post - this needs to be repeated about once every five minutes on this comment section. Anti-gun people are lower than so-called stone age men. Their political/idealogical bias causes them to willfully be ignorant of the adage - the right tool for the right job.

Let''s recap the use of tools: a knife to the back, a shovel to the head did little more than aggravate the already aggravated wild animal. A 9mm or .40 S&W, standard issue for most police departments didn''t immediately do the job either, but did do enough damage to cause it to retreat (and later die) thus sparing any others from harm.

No, anti-gun people do live in a fairy tale world that shatters to pieces when every once in awhile reality comes knocking at their door.

Posted by: Pro NRA | Feb 21, 2009
reply


How about instead of taking a situation with a deadly animal and adding deadly weapons, we just remove the deadly animal? Chimpanzees are clearly inappropriate pets.

Posted by: anonymous | Mar 23, 2009
reply


If Sandra Herold the lunatic owner of Travis, the chimp had a gun SHE could have saved her friend but no like all good liberals should did not believe in guns until it came time to actually use one. How come Herold did not call the ACLU to save her friend? Instead she called the police to do the job she could have done.
Liberalism is indeed a mental disorder.

Posted by: TexasForever | Feb 21, 2009
reply


This indeed was a tragedy for all involved....by the way did Travis go for regularly scheduled vet visits?

Posted by: myway | Feb 21, 2009
reply


HA!!!!!Isn''t that the truth!!!!! Thanks TexasForever I needed that:)

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 21, 2009
reply


Liberalism isn''t a disease, it''s just a lower level of evolution. Like bigfoot, only they can''t take care of themselves when left alone. They need the federal government to take care of them.

Not to be contradictory, of course. Your point has many valid facts behind it. But I interperate those facts in a different way.

All conservatives or people who consider themselves "kind of between the parties" (a weak cop-out for not understanding the values of the two parties) should look into FDR''s darker side (which is the only side I really see, aside from the baseless fluff the media throws at us, and our garbage elementary school history books cover)...

Then they should check the similarities in the garbage Obama''s spewing, vs FDR. Oh, and by the way, Hitler, too. Liberals make Hitler out to be some right-wing nutjob. Wierd that he was a socialist, he wanted the country''s government to control everything, he nationalized -everything-, he played the class warfare card (those jews are hording our nation''s wealth! they''re holding you back! we need to control the jews! which liberals still subscribe to obviously, since they back Iran and attack Israel, yet

Posted by: OmahaJohn | Feb 22, 2009
reply


Stupid comments aside... We only have a few domesticated animals; dogs and cats and we all know they too can behave in a dangerous manner. Domestication occurs over many many many years. The human error here is to begin to believe that wild animals can be domesticated. A wild animals response in a fear situation is the same as trying to stop your eye from blinking if your being poked.
Its called a parasympatetic response. So its surely not the animals fault. The owner takes responsibilty here, we women tend to be maternal, and in her case ending in a tragedy. This is just horrible for all...

Posted by: Penny | Feb 21, 2009
reply


Everybody needs to watch "It''s Pimpin Pimpin" by Katt Williams. He talks about this whole thing with the Tiger in the San Franscico Zoo.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 21, 2009
reply


I just thought of a great pet gift idea from the American people to Pres Obama. I went to the local "Chimps4u" store and picked up a cute little guy nicknamed Fury. Would anyone like to go in on him with me?

Posted by: Charles | Feb 21, 2009
reply


You are a racist twit who shouldn''t be allowed to speak in public.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 23, 2009
reply


Just like a liberal to stifle free speech that they disagree with. No one should be allowed to speak unless it supports the left''s agenda.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 25, 2009
reply


I love how politics get into EVERY SINGLE news story discussion ;D

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 21, 2009
reply


Is this the change Obama was talking about?

Posted by: G.W. | Feb 21, 2009
reply


Obviously the moderators to this column are missing objectionable comments that are using this story as a vehicle to express their racist views. The editors of this news organization should remove these posts. It is an ugly, embarrassing side of our culture and the United States as a whole. C''mon, we are better than this!

Posted by: Nancy | Feb 21, 2009
reply


Wow! I bet you didn''t ask editors to remove nasty, insulting comments and monkey comparisions about President Bush- did you? Talk about a double standard! No shocker here! Liberals are hypocrites! That fact has been proven time and time again!!!

Posted by: American for Truth | Feb 21, 2009
reply


chimps should only be seen in zoos, and be used for medical research. not pets !!!

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 21, 2009
reply


Chimps should not be seen in zoos OR used for medical research. They should be left in the wild where they belong, where God intended for them to be. They are animals, living, breathing, animals who deserve to just be LEFT ALONE. If they were meant to live among humans then they would be HUMAN not primates. Zoos and Universities are just as bad as this irresponsible idiot of a woman who domesticated a primate.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 23, 2009
reply


I don''t believe in medical research. A friend of mine did it for about 6 months and became so horrified at the torture she imposed on helpless animals (WHO ARE THE SAME SAME SPIRITUAL BEINGS AS WE ARE) that she quit. She later told me about it and regrets ever taking the job. She wished she never did what she did and years later, cannot forget what she did.

I''ll take this opportunity to say that on my honeymoon, in Australia, a Koala Bear ripped a hole right through my ear lobe. It was mating season. It was placed in my arms by the zoo people for a photograph and it - HE - went right for me. I healed fine - I was lucky that he didn''t shred it, like the female Koalas. YOU CANNOT TAKE THE WILD OUT OF A WILD ANIMAL. Whoever said that is absolutely right. Just because it is calm and collected some of the time, doesn''t mean it won''t turn on someone another time. Herald should be liable, would be in some states and the Eastern states is where I believe the law is not in her favor.

Posted by: babyboomer1001 | Feb 24, 2009
reply


Hey if evolution is correct.. we all evolved from chimps so we all a little monkey in all of us ? LOL

Posted by: chump | Feb 21, 2009
reply


There is no question about it. It is all Bush''s fault.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 21, 2009
reply


She should have let the monkey drive her new car. That''s all the little guy wanted.

Posted by: GEAH | Feb 21, 2009
reply


How in hell did THIS article turn political for gods
sake? We all can surely: 1.)take some time off from
the hyper political sensitivities too many seem to
have and 2.)have a some empathy for a poor woman whose
life and physical well being have been destroyed. There
is surely some limit to what one SHOULD make fun of huh!

Posted by: john wiesmuller | Feb 21, 2009
reply


If Travis'' owner hadn''t been a liberal Democrat, none of this would have happened. Call it protecting some other person from a similar fate. Really, the truth has to be spoken.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 21, 2009
reply


I thought I had read an article about the victim being moved to the Cleveland Clinic after being violently attacted by a chimp. By the time I got done reading all the comments I believe both George Bush and Obama may have had something to do with this. This woman must know something and they had to stop her and this is what they came up with.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 21, 2009
reply


This websites comment moderators are sleeping on the job. You SUCK.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 23, 2009
reply


Moderators = though police.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 25, 2009
reply